Silicon (Si) has been used for years in agriculture because of its many, well-documented benefits to plants. Si enters plant roots as silicic acid. Once inside the plant, it travels rapidly to active growing points, where it enters the cell walls, making them stronger. Stronger cell walls lead to stronger plants. Reported benefits of silicon to plant growth and development include increased tolerance to heat, salt, and drought stress, disease and pest resistance, stronger and thicker stems, and shorter internodes.
What is Silicon?
Si exists in the Earth’s crust, in an abundance that is second only to oxygen. Many plants accumulate it in large concentrations, in amounts similar to macronutrients. Plants grown in mineral soils (natural environments, field soils or gardens) have ready access to it. On the other hand, Si is not prevalent in peat moss, bark, or any other components of the soilless substrates that are commonly used today for producing containerized horticultural crops.
Sun Gro’s Silicon Research Program
As the North American leader in horticultural soilless substrates, Sun Gro launched an extensive research program to evaluate the benefits of incorporating Si into their professional and retail growing mixes. This project encompassed trials to evaluate Si sources and incorporation rates, as well as plant growth responses of over 40 commercially important annuals, perennials, and vegetables.
Plants were trialed in seed and cutting propagation experiments, and in finished production, from transplant through post-harvest dry down. For all of our growing trials, substrate pH and EC were monitored weekly or bi-weekly. The degree of rooting was rated on a scale of 1-5 at about 4 weeks after transplant. The number of days from transplant to various developmental stages was recorded. When plants reached the market stage, several shoot-growth parameters were measured and plants were placed into a post-harvest dry down in which the time was recorded from the last watering to wilt.
Si can be added to a substrate in several forms, and can be obtained from many sources. (Sun Gro previously held the patent on substrate incorporation of Si, in any form.) In our initial trials, several Si sources and rates were evaluated. Based on concentrations of Si in media and leaf tissue, and overall plant performance, we zeroed in on an optimal Si source and rate.
Sun Gro’s Silicon Trials
At that point, it was time for a trial blast! We tested Si in fourteen commercially important spring annuals grown in peat- and bark-based mixes. Seed germination trials with vegetables, annuals, and ornamental grasses were also conducted. Positive results from these proof-of-concept tests lead to the creation of Si-containing RESiLIENCE™ mixes! RESILIENCE™ is Sun Gro’s brand name for growing mixes enriched with silicon.
In the next set of trials, summer annuals, perennials, vegetables (direct-sown in jumbo 6-packs), and poinsettias were grown in RESiLIENCE™ mixes that were made on the line at Sun Gro’s manufacturing facility in Anderson, SC. Testing also included plug-production trials with seeds and cuttings in Resilience™ germination/propagation mixes.
Although growth responses to Si varied among plant species and even cultivars, there were some general trends that were prevalent in most plants. Annuals and vegetables that exhibited positive growth responses in RESiLIENCE™ mixes were compiled. Compared with our standard mixes, and based on a root rating scale, the RESiLIENCE™ grown plant roots were visible in up to 40% more of the substrate. Better rooting enhances nutrient uptake and provides greater support for the shoots (Figure 1). Plants grown in RESiLIENCE™ took up to 77% more hours to wilt after water was withheld (Figure 2). This translates into increased shelf-life in retail settings. RESiLIENCE™ mixes promoted thicker stems and earlier flowering: up to 12% increase in stem diameter, and up to 13% earlier flowering (Figures 3 and 4). In finished production, earlier flower development equals fewer days to market. In addition to these typical responses, RESiLIENCE™-grown poinsettias and snapdragons also had stronger and thicker branches and were more compact with denser foliage than those grown in the standard mixes (Figures 5 and 6).
Plug production is inherently different than finished plant production. Growth measurements were evaluated on the entire plug tray rather than individual plants. Germination percentage was obtained on the seed propagation trials at ten days. For both seed and cutting propagation trials, other measurements were taken when the trays were at market stage. Stand (% yield) was assessed on entire trays. Root growth ratings and stem diameter were also collected.
Germination percentage was equal between standard and RESiLIENCE™ mixes. Similar to what we saw in finished production, RESiLIENCE™ plugs had up to 97% better rooting and up to 33% thicker stems. Plugs are considered to be market-ready when the whole plug can be easily pulled from the tray – intact. Since roots help hold the plug together, enhanced rooting equates to fewer days to market. Thicker stems mean less damage to young plants during shipping and transplant.
Satisfied that RESiLIENCE™ mixes worked well for most peat and bark based mixes, we turned our attention to mixes containing coir or high amounts of vermiculite and organic mixes. Also, we trialed Resilience™ mixes with the addition of biologicals and with plant growth regulators to be certain that Resilience™ mixes would not interfere with these commonly used products or cause interactions that could be harmful to plants.
Sun Gro’s Silicon Research Conclusions
At this point, numerous commercially important horticultural crops have been trialed in several different soilless substrates in many types of plant production schemes. Most of this work has been accomplished at the Sun Gro Horticulture Discovery Center. Additionally, there have been several RESiLIENCE™ mix trials conducted independently at universities and with professional growers who have seen the same results of better rooting and thicker stems.
After such thorough evaluation, we are confident that RESiLIENCE™ mixes enhance containerized plants by providing them with the beneficial element, Silicon. Sun Gro offers RESiLIENCE™ mixes to both professional and retail customers. Various mixes are offered that take plants from seed and cutting propagation to finished production.
Sun Gro Horticulture® is proud to introduce RESiLIENCE®, mixes enhanced with silicon. Available in select Black Gold®, Fafard®, Sunshine® and Sunshine Advanced® premium potting soils. Resilience is Sun Gro’s brand name for growing mixes enriched with beneficial silicon—a patented technology developed by the company’s own research horticulturists.
These enhanced potting mixes offer IGC retailers, growers, and consumers big benefits! In numerous trials, plants grown in Resilience mixes show increased stem diameter, improved root growth, increased drought tolerance and even earlier flowering — saving retailers and growers time, money and worry while providing consumers with a better product. Plants even recover better from less-than-perfect watering, which gives them a longer shelf life. “This is a major horticultural breakthrough,” says Chris Bednar, Sun Gro’s COO.
“Growers can now deliver stronger, more vigorous, longer-lasting plants – from the greenhouse to retail to consumer gardens. This will increase sales and reduce plant losses for our growers and garden retailers.”
What are the benefits of Resilience-enhanced mixes?
Time and time again, research at Universities, in commercial grower trials and at the Sun Gro Discovery Center, supports significant and dramatic positive results. Trials have shown that plants grown in silicon-enriched mixes have the following advantages:
40% BETTER ROOT GROWTH for increased nutrient uptake and support
12% INCREASED STEM DIAMETER for stronger plants and reduced breakage
77% LONGER TIME BEFORE WILT for increased shelf life
13% EARLIER FLOWERING for more attractive plants, faster
*Results will vary by plant type and grower practices Do Resilience-enhanced mixes benefit all crops?
Research included collection of week-by-week growth data of over 40 commercially important annuals, perennials, and vegetables in finished production, from transplant through “post harvest” dry down. Resilience mixes were also trialed in plug production systems. Tests were conducted using Sun Gro’s Sunshine®, Fafard® and Metro Mix® professional lines of peat-based and bark-based growing and propagation mixes, which contain the same ingredients used in its retail brands.
According to Janet Rippy, Ph.D., lead researcher of the Resilience program at the Sun Gro Discovery Center, “results may vary by species, growing conditions and grower practices; but after extensive research and trialing, we are confident that RESiLIENCE® mixes benefit plant growth in numerous commercially important horticultural crops.”
The research is ongoing, but as we learn more, the benefits become increasingly clear. Silicon can and should become an integral part of soilless growing technology to allow plants to grow more naturally and resiliently in any containerized growing environment.
How do Resilience-enhanced mixes work?
Plants absorb the easy-to-access RESiLIENCE® silicon where it becomes part of the roots, shoots and leaves to improve organic strength. It essentially provides reinforcement to make plants tougher and more resilient, which helps them cope better with environmental stresses. Stronger stems mean plants are more durable and wind resistant, and silicon-fortified foliage helps plants resist drought. See the Resilience difference!
The results have been so impressive, we believe RESiLIENCE® silicon-enriched growing mixes will become the new standard for growers and gardeners. Why? Because consumers will see the results. When they use Black Gold®, Fafard®, Sunshine® and /or Sunshine Advanced® quality potting mixes enriched with RESiLIENCE®, their plants will be stronger, last longer, and recover more quickly from infrequent or inconsistent watering. Try RESiLIENCE® and see the difference!
Read everything that you need to know about horticultural silicon with this grower to Sun Gro technical specialist Q&A. Horticultural silicon is a water-soluble element that’s readily available to plants.
I’ve been hearing about silicon in plants and want to discuss the subject. Isn’t silicon ubiquitous?
True, silicon is the second most abundant element in the Earth’s crust, where surface soil exists. Plants growing in natural soil are constantly in contact with silicon. Of course, plants don’t indiscriminately take in all of the elements they encounter in soil; they take in elements selectively. Plants do naturally take in and accumulate silicon, which indicates they’re using it. In fact, most plants growing in natural soils take in as much silicon as common nutrients essential for growth, like phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sulfur. Some plant species take in more silicon than even nitrogen and potassium!
What about silicon in potting media? Aren’t some potting media components, like sand, perlite, vermiculite, silicon-based?
Virtually no container grower uses natural topsoil in potting media anymore. Container growers use soilless media that’s mostly made of organic materials like peat, bark, coir, etc. These organic materials have hardly any minerals, let alone silicon. Although sand, pumice, perlite, vermiculite, rockwool are technically silicon materials, silicon from these materials is barely available to plants. In fact, silicon content in the plants growing in these soilless media is remarkably lower compared to the same plant species growing in natural soil.
Are my plants deprived of silicon when grown in soilless media?
Yes, compared to the natural world, where silicon is the norm in natural soil and where silicon is an integral part of natural plants, lack of silicon in soilless growing media and in turn plants growing in such media are artifacts and not entirely normal plants!
I’ve been growing plants alright in soilless media without silicon. Is it really needed?
Silicon got neglected— although unknowingly— during the historical and gradual transition from using all field soil to some field soil to completely soilless media in containers. That you can grow plants without silicon didn’t help either in silicon getting any attention. Silicon is not essential to plants, meaning plants can grow, flower and finish their life without silicon. You don’t see any obvious symptoms on plants when silicon is deficient, so you don’t pay any attention to silicon. Silicon is a beneficial element. It is similar to fluoride for our teeth. Fluoride is not essential for humans, but fluoride is beneficial in that it strengthens tooth enamel making it less vulnerable to cavities.
Does silicon strengthen plants? Does it have other benefits?
In nature, plants have evolved to absorb and use silicon to become not just structurally but also biochemically strong. Plants use silicon to cope with a variety of adverse conditions they encounter— such as pest attacks, strong winds, water shortages, toxic elements, etc. Think of plant using silicon to build a more solid house for itself against the huffs and puffs of adversaries!
What actually happens when silicon is available to the plants?
Plant roots take in silicon that is in the form of silicic acid and transport majority of it to the shoot along with the water stream. Along the way, some silicic acid is deposited in the roots and some in the xylem in the shoot. After reaching leaves, silicic acid is deposited in the walls of epidermal cells, just beneath the cuticle. As water is lost through transpiration, silicic acid concentrates and polymerizes to solid silica gel. This results in the formation of a double layer of cuticle-silicon. The solid silica gel bodies are called phytoliths or plant opals, as they give toughness to plant tissues. In fact, fossilized phytoliths are what archeologists find years later and use to identify what kind of plants existed at a site!
Does the double layer of cuticle-silicon in plants act as armor?
Yes, to enter into a plant, fungal spores or insects have to puncture and penetrate the plant surface or cuticle first. When there is a silicon-reinforced barrier there, the resistance to the puncture increases and the progress of pest entry, in turn the incidence of pest attack decreases. The solidified silicon wears off mandibles of insect larva when they chew plant tissue, thereby limiting plant damage by insects.
You mentioned silicon protects plants biochemically, too. How?
Right, solidified silicon acting as an armor is not the whole story in silicon’s role in protecting the plants. When pathogen fungal spores attempt to penetrate the leaf, the fraction of silicon that’s still in solution form there— that’s silicic acid not yet solidified— triggers the synthesis of organic defense compounds within the plant by the plant itself. These compounds also obviate the fungal infection process. For this kind of protection, silicon in the plant should be in the form of silicic acid during the pest attack, because silicon that’s already solidified cannot reverse back to silicic acid. Solidified silicon within the plant cannot move from one location to another either— thus, a continuous availability of silicon is needed for growing plant tissues.
How do silicon-reinforced plants compare to those grown in standard mixes?
Yes, in nature, plants don’t want to collapse. In nature, plants absorb, deposit and solidify silicon in cell walls to gain structural rigidity so as to be erect and strong and resist falling during strong winds. The same effect of strong stems translates to fewer branch breaks during handling and shipping of your container plants, which are often top heavy. Such strong stems also help in cut flowers not being bent in floral arrangements. In nature, silicon-solidified stiff leaves hold wide and intercept and capture more light. Such an effect counteracts straggly plants with soft, droopy leaves, which often occur from the use of high nitrogen fertilizers in greenhouse plants. The silicon layer formed below the cuticle in leaves acts as a barrier against water loss from transpiration through cuticle. This effect reduces withering of leaves and prolongs the shelf life of container plants at retail stores.
Are there any other positive effects from silicon?
Silicon has such diverse effects on plants that it’s difficult settle on just one effect of silicon in any plant species. Silicon mitigates toxicity from micronutrient metals like manganese, copper, zinc, iron and balances their levels in plants. For example, you may have seen ugly brown spots on foliage of ornamental plants— on pothos, palms, etc.— due to toxic accumulation of oxidized manganese, coming from high manganese bark mix or low pH in growing media. Silicon prevents the buildup of such spots of toxic concentrations of manganese by distributing manganese evenly, thereby suppressing the appearance of ugly spots on ornamental plants. Similarly, silicon prevents copper toxicity, which plants can encounter from composts, fungicides or ionization of irrigation water. You may even have seen a copper toxicity symptom in your growing and probably mistook it as iron deficiency— for instance, chlorosis on the leaves of petunias! Interestingly, silicon ameliorates true iron deficiency too, modulating iron in the plants under iron deficiency conditions, resulting in significantly greener leaves and slower senescence. Silicon also helps plants cope with high salinity or high EC by reducing the level of salts getting into the shoots by blocking salt flow through the roots. This effect is especially important if your irrigation water is not of high quality or you are recycling your water, which tends to have high salinity.
Based on research, are silicon benefits more obvious when plants face adverse conditions?
When the going gets rough, with silicon, plants get tough! As you perceived, effects of silicon are not so evident or muted when plants are growing under benign conditions, but the effects become more apparent when plants come under stress. Stress is a universal condition all organisms face, so like you, plants do face stress conditions in real world, even in commercial greenhouse growing. In response, when plants have access to silicon, they use silicon as needed, sometimes acquiring silicon only under stress and reacting adaptively to those stresses. Effects of silicon are realized even better when a stress develops gradually, approximating the stress plants encounter in nature.
Greenhouse-grown plants are always weaker than those grown outdoors. Could some of these growth differences be due to a silicon deficiency in plants grown in soilless media?
Observations on plants without and with silicon have been corroborated in laboratory experiments. In fact, such pragmatic observations on plants grown in the field soil versus in the soilless mixes in greenhouses are kindling the attention to silicon from greenhouse growers.
Can field-grown plants benefit from the addition of horticultural silicon?
It depends on soil type and attributes. For example, Florida farmers get positive responses in sugarcane quality when they apply silicon, and the application of silicon to rice is routine in Japan. This is because sugarcane in Florida is largely grown in the mucky soils of the Everglades, which are highly organic and silicon poor— just like your organic potting media. Likewise, Japanese rice farmers started using silicon long ago because they realized that their staple food crop— rice— wasn’t growing well without additional silicon due to the high organic matter in rice paddies. In either situation, adding sand to the soil would not help because silicon in this form is unavailable to plants.
Mineral soils may also benefit from applications of horticultural silicon. Native silicon, even in mineral soils, can be depleted due to continuous, repeated cropping. Of late, silicon applications are also becoming common in hydroponic crops, like cucumber, tomato, rose, etc.
Don’t some plants accumulate more silicon than others?
Yes, the amount of silicon accumulated varies not only among the crops, but even within the varieties of the same crop. Some varieties of rice accumulate silicon up to 10% of their dry weight. However, even 0.5% silicon in any plant is still similar to the percentages of essential nutrients like phosphorus, magnesium, sulfur. There are also differences among crops in their interaction with silicon. For example, there are variations in how much silicon is deposited in which plant organ (root, shoot, leaves, flowers, bracts, etc.) and where in the organ (lower leaves, upper leaves, lower or upper surface of a leaf, edges or middle of a leaf, etc.). The form (size, shape, texture) of silica structures or opal phytoliths formed among plants is also diverse. Uptake of silicon by plants differs under different conditions (summer versus winter). Such intrinsic differences in silicon accumulation patterns in turn influence the effects of silicon in various plants to various degrees under various conditions. Thus, less silicon in a plant doesn’t mean it is less effective functionally or less beneficial. For instance, lettuce accumulates little silicon (0.05%) but still just that much silicon somehow alleviates manganese toxicity, a plague in heading of lettuce. What exact role silicon plays in all the plant species under what context is still not fully understood. As a university professor put it, the biochemistry of silicon is the proverbial riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma!
Though we don’t yet understand the dynamics of silicon in plant life fully, I presume there would be some role for silicon in all the plants since there is no ‘no-silicon’ plant in nature! So far, the subject of silicon has been deficient in my mind and silicon has been deficient in my plants. Now, I want to insure all my plants have silicon available to them just as in nature. So, how can I provide silicon to plants growing in soilless potting mixes? Not through silicon chips, I presume!
Sorry, no luck recycling your old computer chips to provide silicon to the plants! Providing silicon effectively to the plants growing in soilless media is a significant challenge, which is another reason why use of silicon in soilless culture is hampered. Remember that silicon is abundant on the Earth, so not surprisingly there are many natural silicon compounds, as well as industrial byproducts. However, just because a compound has silicon in its name doesn’t mean it’s a suitable source for plants in soilless media. Similarly, a material that contains more silicon doesn’t mean it provides more silicon to plants. After all, we just learned that plants hardly obtain silicon from sand, which literally is silicon! If you want to evaluate a silicon source, remember labs don’t test for plant-available silicon routinely.
Providing silicon to plants through irrigation is complicated too. Silicon sources for such use are not stable and when mixed into a regular feed solution, precipitation and severe clogging of irrigation nozzles occur. Such a precipitation interaction occurring in the growing media can obstruct watering and drainage of the growing media.
Roots of plants growing in natural field soils explore large volume of soil for silicon. However, roots of plants growing in containers can explore just the media limited to the container. Thus, a silicon source in soilless media in containers should be sufficiently available for the plants in the containers. The source should be pure and free of contaminants. It should be consistent from batch to batch. It shouldn’t compromise physical and chemical qualities of the growing media. Of course, low cost helps. Such a silicon source already embedded in the growing media would be convenient, so you don’t need to change your existing practices of watering, fertilizing, etc. Promising efforts have been made to embed such a silicon source into soilless growing media. Discuss with your growing media supplier.
Well, with fluoride embedded toothpaste, there has been decline in tooth cavities. With silicon embedded soilless media, there would be a decline in damage to plants from pests and other stresses. With silicon integrated into soilless growing, plants growing in soilless media can emulate plants in nature in building up their inborn defenses. Such plants would need less pesticides and growth regulators based on University research. In our production of crops in soilless media, we desire such simple and natural practices.
Though the subject of silicon in plants still poses many fascinating questions, we’ve come a long way in our understanding of it and now there is enough evidence showing silicon benefits plants. So, silicon can now become an integral part of soilless growing technology and then, yes, plants in soilless culture can grow naturally— just like in nature!
(The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Sun Gro. A version of this article appeared in GrowerTalks May 2014.)
Silicon potting mix was one of the new products developed in the 1990s at the then Sun Gro R&D facility in Warwick (New York). Dr Shiv Reddy, along with the late Dr Paul King, developed and patented a novel soilless growing media that includes silicon. Dr Todd Cavins, who had researched silicon effects in greenhouse crop production at Oklahoma State, joined Sun Gro in 2005 and renewed the interest in silicon at Sun Gro.
Since those early days, numerous investigations at universities, government departments of agriculture across the world and 6 international conferences on silicon in agriculture plus symposiums, workshops show growing importance of silicon in plant life. All this evidence triggered the Association of American Plant Food Control Officials (AAPFCO) to look at silicon in a new way and designate and accept it as beneficial substance in 2012.
In 2013, the new management at Sun Gro, while reviewing the assets of Sun Gro, realizing the importance of silicon in horticultural growing, decided to update the silicon mix research at the current Sun Gro Discovery Centre for research in Anderson (South Carolina) and offer the product to the horticultural industry.
On the eve of this new product launch at Cultivate 14 in 2014, Shiv presents a thoughtful conversation, answering the questions that growers may have and perhaps they didn’t know they have!
If you have further questions, please contact a Sun Gro Technical Specialist.
Reading fertilizer labels would be a good cure for insomnia. Most of you only dig into a fertilizer label only when the need arises and specific information is needed. Let us review what is on the label, why it is there, and the
potential usefulness of the information.
Most fertilizer bags are covered with a lot of printed information. Soluble fertilizer bags show suggested application rates, and instructions for making concentrates for various injector ratios and other directions for use. Controlled release fertilizer (CRF) bags show incorporation and top-dress application rates, and information on release characteristics. Every bag of fertilizer also shows a statement of guaranteed analysis and the ingredients used to make for formulation (“Derived from” statement), required by state law. The guaranteed analysis is the official label. Primary Nutrients
Fertilizers are identified by a 3 number designation termed the “grade” 20-10-20, for example. The first number, 20, indicates the amount of nitrogen contained in the fertilizer as a percentage by weight. On the label, it is shown as “Total Nitrogen (N)”. 100 pounds of this fertilizer contains 20 pounds of elemental nitrogen (N).
The second number, 10 in our example, is used to show the amount of phosphorus contained in the fertilizer. On the label, the terms “Available Phosphoric Acid (P2O5)”, Available Phosphate (P2O5)” and Available Phosphorus (P2O5)” can be used interchangeably. The amount of phosphorus is expressed as percent by weight P2O5 (phosphate). 100 pounds of 20-10-20 would contain 10 pounds of P2O5.
The third number, 20 in our example, indicates the amount of potassium in the fertilizer. On the label, it can be shown as “Soluble Potassium (K2O)” or “Soluble Potash (K2O)” expressed as percent by weight K2O (potash). 100 pounds of 20-10-20 would contain 20 pounds of K2O.
This is where the confusion can start. It is easy to understand that 100 pounds of 20-10-20 contains 20 pounds of elemental nitrogen (N). The 100 pounds also contains 10 pounds of phosphate (P2O5). This is not the same as elemental phosphorus (P) that we are accustomed to seeing in soil test results. Because phosphate (P2O5) is heavier than phosphorus (P), a factor must be used to convert to the more familiar P (phosphorus):
-phosphate (P2O5) multiplied by 0.43 equals P. 100 pounds of 20-10-20 contains only 4.3 pounds of P.
Potash (K2O) is not the same as the more familiar K (potassium) and also requires conversion. To convert potash to K:
-potash (K20) multiplied by 0.83 equals K. 100 pounds of 20-10-20 contains 16.6 pounds of K.
So, 100 pounds of 20-10-20 contains 20 pounds of N, 4.3 pounds of P and 16.6 pounds of K. The actual N-P-K analysis is 20-4.3-16.6. This conversion is necessary for any calculations involving parts per million.
After the 3 number analysis, the label goes into more detail. The total amount of N is broken out into the various sources. The percent by weight of N derived from nitrate is shown as “Nitrate Nitrogen” and that from ammonium as “Ammonium Nitrogen”.
Some fertilizers, like 20-20-20, contain urea as a nitrogen source. The percent by weight of urea derived N would be shown as “Urea Nitrogen” or “Water Soluble Nitrogen” on the label.
The term “Water Insoluble Nitrogen” is seen on some granular top-dress type fertilizer labels. This indicates the percent of urea derived N from urea formaldehyde (UF), methylene urea (MU) or isobutylidenediurea (IBDU), which are urea-containing uncoated slow release fertilizers.
The breakout of Total Nitrogen (N) into the various N sources allows the ratio of nitrate N to ammonium and urea N to be calculated. This N breakout is important because you can change the N source ratio as a crop toning strategy. A common strategy is to increase the ammioniacal (ammonium and urea content) when soft, lush growth is desired. However, one should be cautious about too much ammonical nitrogen. A common recommendation is that no more than 40% of the N source be ammoniacal N when a fertilizer is used regularly. This is especially true in northern climates or during cooler times of the year. Some growers switch away from ammonium and urea containing fertilizers during the winter to ensure problems do not arise with toxicities as well as help maintain toned plant growth. Also, changing the ratio of nitrate N to ammonium and urea N influences the way the fertilizer affects the pH of the growing mix and so can be used in pH management. Secondary Nutrients
On some formulations, the secondary nutrients magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca) and sulfur (S) are guaranteed on the label in elemental form as percent by weight. It is important to note that not all fertilizers contain the secondary nutrients. Your water quality should be used to determine if the water soluble fertilizer you choose needs these nutrients. Just because they are called “secondary” doesn’t mean they are any less important, it just means they may not be needed in as great of quantity and may be readily supplied by your water source. Micro Nutrients
Fertilizers can contain trace elements not shown on the label. For an element to appear on the label, it must meet minimum concentration requirements. Fertilizers are regulated at the state level, and the various state labeling laws are similar but not identical. Some of the micro nutrient levels in soluble fertilizers are too low to meet the minimum required for guarantee so they cannot be listed on the label. This is why you will often see lawn fertilizers listed with just the N,P, & K concentrations. However, exceptions are made for soluble fertilizer products where the label shows the phrase “For Continuous Liquid Feed Programs”, and micro nutrients are listed.
As with the primary and secondary nutrients, the micro nutrients are listed in elemental form as a percentage by weight. A fertilizer might contain 0.10% iron, meaning that 100 pounds of fertilizer would contain 1.6 ounces of iron. Some fertilizer formulations contain higher micro nutrient levels than others. Of particular importance is the boron level because plants have a narrow tolerance range for that element. Because some irrigation water sources contain high boron levels, some growers must pay close attention to the amount of boron contained in the fertilizer.
Next on the label is the “Derived from” statement, listing the fertilizer material sources of the nutrients guaranteed on the label. In short, these are the ingredients that make the fertilizer.
Another useful statement is listed only on soluble fertilizer labels- the potential acidity or potential basicity of the material expressed in pounds of calcium carbonate (limestone) per ton. This is very important because it indicates how use of the fertilizer affects the pH of the growing mix.
For example, 20-20-20 has a potential acidity of 597 pounds of calcium carbonate per ton. This means that 597 pounds of calcium carbonate would be needed to neutralize the acidity generated by 1 ton of this fertilizer. In contrast, 20-10-20 has a lower potential acidity per ton, 422 pounds of calcium carbonate. While both fertilizers would have an acidifying effect on the growing mix, 20-10-20 would have less because its potential acidity is less.
Some fertilizers like 15-0-15 have potential basicity, meaning use of the fertilizer can cause the growing mix pH to go up. The potential basicity of 15-0-15 is 418 pounds of calcium carbonate per ton. This means that the use of 1 ton of this fertilizer would have the same pH raising effect as the application of 418 pounds of limestone. The fertilizer’s effect on growing mix pH is a very important factor in nutritional management.
These cryptic fertilizer labels provide much useful information. The 3-number analysis can be used for parts per million calculations. The nitrogen source breakout can be used for seasonal fertility adjustments or for managing crop toning. The presence or absence of calcium, magnesium and sulfur can be determined to match your water quality And, for most fertilizers, the concentration of micro-nutrients are listed, and with soluble fertilizer, the potential effect on growing mix pH can be estimated.
Summary: Limestone is added to growing media to adjust the pH to a desirable level, however other factors influence medium pH while a plant is growing—namely water quality and fertilizer usage. When considering a fertilizer’s influence on pH, a given material’s acid or basic reaction must be known. With water soluble fertilizer, it is shown on the bag. With controlled release fertilizer it can be assessed by the ingredients.
Compared to pH management, fertility management seems easy: you either fertilize or you don’t. With commercial water soluble fertilizers, the water turns a reassuring blue color. With controlled release fertilizers you can actually see and squeeze the prills (firm prills contain fertilizer while soft ones are empty). Growing mix pH, however, cannot be visually judged, even by the crudest methods, until plant growth is impacted. And no grower wants to be alerted to pH problems by plant symptoms. To monitor pH, the mix must be tested. To manage pH, the 4 factors influencing pH must be understood. These are the: 1. mix, 2. water, 3. fertilizer and 4. crop.
Today, we will focus on these four factors and how fertilizer influences growing mix pH.
The pH is just a measure of the number of hydrogen ions in the mix, measured on a scale of 1 to 14. If there are lots of hydrogen ions, the pH will be low, and the mix will be acidic. Few hydrogen ions result in a higher, more basic pH. When the pH is 7, the mix is neutral, neither acidic nor basic. Mix pH is important because it impacts the availability of the various ions of fertilizer nutrients.
When making a growing mix, limestone must be added to adjust the starting pH to a desired point—typically 6.0. Usually, the lime used is crushed dolomite, a mixture of calcium and magnesium carbonate. When the mix is first watered, the dolomite starts to dissolve. The carbonate fraction of the dolomite reacts with the water, tying up hydrogen ions and reducing their number, resulting in higher pH. The calcium and magnesium contained in the lime do not tie up hydrogen ions but do compete for exchange sites in the mix. They do not directly influence the pH.
This initial pH adjustment consumes some of the dolomite. At pH 6.0, there are some, but not a lot, of hydrogen ions in the mix. Because there are few hydrogen ions to tie up, the remaining dolomite is held in reserve.
Even though the pH was adjusted when the mix was made, growing mixes have only a limited ability to resist pH changes during crop production. The three factors that can move the pH away from the starting point are the type of fertilizer used, the properties of the irrigation water and the crop being grown.
Fertilizers can be classified by their effects on growing mix pH. Acidic or acid-forming fertilizers lower mix pH. Basic fertilizers can cause the mix pH to increase. A third class, neutral or non-acid forming fertilizers have no effect on pH.
Fertilizers can be mixtures of many chemical compounds. With most commonly used greenhouse fertilizers, nitrogen sources are the primary causes of acidity or basicity. A 20-20-20 mix, for example, is a mixture of potassium nitrate, ammonium phosphate and urea. Each of the three ingredients contains a different nitrogen source. The three sources used are nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen and urea nitrogen; nitrate nitrogen has a basic affect, raising pH, while ammonium and urea nitrogen are acid forming, lowering pH.
A fertilizer’s effect on pH depends on the ratio of nitrate nitrogen to ammonium and/or urea nitrogen: the more nitrate, the more basic, and the more ammonium and/or urea, the more acidic. This information is prominently shown on the fertilizer label. The material’s percent nitrogen will be broken out into percent nitrate, ammonium and/or urea. For any given fertilizer, these percentages can be used to predict its effect on mix pH.
With soluble fertilizers, it is easy to determine the potential effect on mix pH. Each bag label shows a statement of potential acidity of basicity in terms of pounds of limestone (calcium carbonate) per ton of fertilizer. For acid-forming fertilizers, the statement indicates the poundage of limestone required to neutralize the acidity produced by 1 ton of that fertilizer, and for basic fertilizers, the poundage of limestone needed to equal the acid neutralizing power of 1 ton of the fertilizer is indicated. The poundage numbers have no direct meaning other than for comparing one fertilizer to another. Listed below are some common soluble fertilizers along with the potential acidity or potential basicity (from most acid to most basic):
24-8-16 potential acidity 667 pounds calcium carbonate per ton
20-10-20 potential acidity 392 pounds calcium carbonate per ton
15-16-17 potential acidity 215 pounds calcium carbonate per ton
15-5-15 potential basicity 141 pounds calcium carbonate per ton
15-0-15 potential basicity 296 pounds calcium carbonate per ton
By examining and comparing statements, a fertilizer’s potential to change mix pH can be judged. The greater the potential acidity number, the more acid-forming the fertilizer. Conversely, the greater the potential basicity number, the more basic the fertilizer.
Controlled release fertilizer (CRF) labels do not show potential acidity/basicity statements, however, most of the commonly used coated greenhouse type CRFs contain both nitrate and ammonium in a ratio of about 1:1, making them acidifying. Those that contain urea are somewhat more acid-forming. Higher application rates generate more acidity, and soil incorporation will affect pH faster and to a greater extent than top-dressing. The acidic effects of CRF are much weaker than those of an acidic soluble fertilizer.
In a new situation, predicting the degree to which the mix pH might change can be complex. Type of fertilizer, concentration, frequency of application, degree of leaching and time all influence a fertilizer’s effect on mix pH. Also of huge importance, though not discussed in this article, is the effect of the irrigation water’s alkalinity. Even the plant species being grown influences the growing mix pH. For example, geraniums are acid-producing plants. Just consider the pH management problems experienced by geranium stock plant growers!
Growing mix pH is not a constant. Even though the pH is set when the mix is made, the mix has a limited ability to resist a pH change during crop production. After the initial watering-in, the mix pH is subject to change by the fertilizer used. Statements made on the fertilizer bags indicate the degree that the material will impact mix pH. Mix pH management is easier with the understanding that mix pH is modified by a number of known factors other than the amount of lime in the mix.
The Sun Gro’er In the last issue of the Sun-Gro’er we introduced the concept of the E-value. The E-value was devised to help answer a horticulturists question “How quickly will a mix dry out?” The E-value measurement summarizes the duration of time it takes for a mix to dry down in a controlled environment. Rather than just giving “snapshot” information on air and water porosity im-mediately after saturation as traditional physical property measures do, the goal of the E-value is to provide information on how a mix performs over time by using a single number (the higher the number the wetter the mix over time) that considers many physical property measurements… Read more
In the last issue of the Sun Gro’er we reported on the little known “secret” concerning peat bog restoration under the direction of Dr. Line Rochefort. But the “rest of the story” is the work being conducted by the Peatland Ecology Research Group (PERG) centered at the University of Laval in Quebec, Canada. This group is a network of world-class researchers working on various aspects of sphagnum peatland ecology, restoration and environmental impact with the main objective to develop a knowledge base that would contribute to the responsible management of Canadian peatlands. Again, this function is supported from Canadian governmental agencies and also the Canadian Sphagnum Peat Moss Association (CSPMA). –Rick Vetanovetz Read More in The Sun Gro’er Issue 7/2 (2012)
Sun Gro has developed a new product for sale to the professional and hydroponics markets – Sunshine #4 Mix with Mycorrhizae. This mix is sold in 3.0 cubic foot compressed bales. The package is slightly smaller than the typical 3.8 cubic foot package, which seems to be more amenable to customers in the hydroponics market.
The ingredients of the blend are the same ingredients as the standard, and very popular, Sunshine #4 Mix but also with the addition of mycorrhizae. Read More in The Sun Gro’er Issue 7/2 (2012)
Water release curves are used by soil scientists to understand how soils or growing media “hold” and “give up” water. Growing media can hold and “release” water differently depending on the type and percentage of ingredients used in the mix. This information, taken together with E-values, can enhance our customers knowledge to make better judgments on what type of growing media will suit their particular operation. –Shiv Reddy Read More in The Sun Gro’er Issue 7/2 (2012)
In the last issue of the Sun Gro’er, we introduced the concept of the E-value. It was devised to help answer the common horticultural question: “How quickly will a mix dry out?” The E-value measurement summarizes the duration of time it takes for a mix to dry down in a controlled environment. Rather than just giving “snapshot” information on air and water porosity immediately after saturation, as traditional physical property measures do, the goal of the E-value is to provide information on how a mix performs over time by using a single number (the higher the number the wetter the mix over time) that considers many physical property measurements. –Todd Cavins Read More in The Sun Gro’er Issue 7/2 (2012)